How we rate CS2 crash sites
Every score on CrashLog is the weighted sum of six criteria, calculated by code from published numbers. Every fact carries a date.
Criteria and weights
The composite is the sum of each criterion score times its weight. Weights add up to 100% and are the same for every operator. Scores are stored in tenths and weights in percent, so the arithmetic is exact, and we round only once, at the end. The ranking order is the order of the composites, highest first.
| Criterion | What we look at | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Fairness transparency | Provably fair page, verifiability | 25% |
| License and operator disclosure | Named authority, licence number, operating company | 20% |
| Payout and withdrawal reliability | Options, stated times, reported problems | 20% |
| Third-party reputation | Independent reports and user feedback | 15% |
| Crash product and game range | Crash quality, limits, other CS2 modes | 10% |
| Bonus transparency and responsible-gambling tools | Bonus terms, limits, self-exclusion | 10% |
See the result in the CS2 crash sites ranking.
Scoring scale (0–10)
Each criterion is scored from 0 to 10 against the bands below.
Fairness transparency 25%
| Score | What it looks like |
|---|---|
| 0–3 | No fairness explanation, or one that cannot be checked. |
| 4–6 | A fairness claim with a partial explanation and no way to recompute rounds. |
| 7–8 | A dedicated page with hashed seeds and a documented formula. |
| 9–10 | All of that, plus a working verifier or public code and clear seed rotation. |
License and operator disclosure 20%
| Score | What it looks like |
|---|---|
| 0–3 | No licence or operator named. |
| 4–6 | A licence is claimed but the authority or number is missing. |
| 7–8 | Authority, number and operating company shown on the operator's own pages. |
| 9–10 | All of that, confirmed on the authority's public register. |
Payout and withdrawal reliability 20%
| Score | What it looks like |
|---|---|
| 0–3 | Withdrawal problems widely reported, or methods unclear. |
| 4–6 | Few methods, or stated times with no supporting evidence. |
| 7–8 | Several methods, stated times and mostly consistent reports. |
| 9–10 | Wide options and times that match the stated ones. |
Third-party reputation 15%
| Score | What it looks like |
|---|---|
| 0–3 | Many recent, specific complaints from users. |
| 4–6 | Mostly negative or very thin independent feedback. |
| 7–8 | Mixed to positive independent reports and user feedback. |
| 9–10 | Consistently positive, recent, specific independent reports. |
Crash product and game range 10%
| Score | What it looks like |
|---|---|
| 0–3 | No crash game, or crash on a poor implementation. |
| 4–6 | Crash available with few options. |
| 7–8 | Crash with auto cash-out, clear limits and other CS2 modes. |
| 9–10 | A deep crash product with clear rules, limits and history tools. |
Bonus transparency and responsible-gambling tools 10%
| Score | What it looks like |
|---|---|
| 0–3 | No tools and no bonus terms shown. |
| 4–6 | Some tools, bonus terms hard to find. |
| 7–8 | Limits, self-exclusion and clear bonus terms. |
| 9–10 | All of that, plus reality checks and easy-to-find help links. |
Verification
Each operator page shows the date every fact was last checked. We re-check operator details and independent reports on a rolling basis, and we update a date only when we have looked again. Data on this site was last verified on 10 Nov 2026.
The review pages for all five operators follow the same template and the same checks:
Independence
CrashLog is independent. We have no commercial relationship with any operator we cover. Scores come only from the published weights above, and no operator can change its score or its position. Links to operators are plain links to each official site. They carry no tracking and earn us nothing. Read more about CrashLog.
Corrections
If something is wrong, tell us. Send the page, the fact and a source through the contact page. We will check it, fix it if it is wrong and update the date. Operators can ask for corrections the same way, and the same evidence rules apply to them.